Category Archives: Social | Digital | Content | Marketing

Journey analytics: The GPS for understanding your customers

Journey-0d443e61f9b8aec9490d09cf3e986e50164b5613

Some say it’s the journey — not the destination — that really matters. That’s certainly true when it comes to your customers. While many consumers achieve their goal by traveling across multiple interactions with your brand, just one terrible, disjointed experience can send them…

Please visit Marketing Land for the full article.

mktingland?d=yIl2AUoC8zA mktingland?d=qj6IDK7rITs

Tags:

8 Things Any Good Marketer Should Know About Email

good-marketer-know-email-390x215-ee817eea1b287da86d435dcf7cb839378bb05355

Email is the most valuable tool for any content marketer – and our research proves it. 93% of B2B marketers use email to distribute content, and of those, 91% consider email to be critical.

Email can do so much to help you build better relationships with your audience, understand individuals’ behaviors, and even maximize the reach of your paid social content.

That was the wisdom from Mathew Sweezey, principal of marketing insights at Salesforce and author of Marketing Automation for Dummies, in his Content Marketing World 2016 presentation, How to Improve the Value of Your Email Through Marketing Automation.

His tips on how to leverage email in today’s world for better content marketing range from subject lines to email “plays” and why it’s more important than ever to obtain people’s email addresses.

Customize first impression by buyer’s stage

Think about how you peruse your inbox in the morning. Do you open the first email, decide if it’s good content, and move on to the next? Or do you delete all the worthless emails and read what remains?

Chances are it’s the latter. That’s why your subject line and sender “are the only pieces of information to determine if email is credible,” Mathew says.


Subject line & sender are the only pieces of information to determine if #email is credible. @msweezey.
Click To Tweet


As such, you should use that email real estate differently depending on the recipient’s stage in the buying process. Here are the guidelines by stage:

  • Stage one: This audience is asking generic questions. They may not even know the keywords in that space. If they see a vendor’s name in the prime email real estate, they know the email is from a marketer. In the prime email real estate, don’t include keywords or brand names.
  • Stage two: This audience is looking for social proof to support their research. Use the subject line to give them ammunition to get support from others. In the prime email real estate, use a keyword or brand name, but not both.
  • Stage three: This audience wants to know they have researched all their options before they make a decision. In the prime real estate, use a keyword and brand name.

Quickly create emails

One-third of marketers take seven weeks to create a piece of content; 42% take two to five weeks.

You can’t craft emails the same way. Identify brief content already created that can be shared through email.


Identify brief #content already created that can be shared through #email, says @anngynn.
Click To Tweet


Mathew shares what he learned working with MIT’s Sloan School of Management to identify the behavior of people signing up for MBA programs. The research showed MBA candidates evaluating which schools to apply to value things outside of the actual degree, such as the connection with professors.

MIT now knew promoting their professors as individuals could make a difference. In their email marketing, they linked to the professors’ LinkedIn profiles. The prospective student then was only a click away from learning more personally about and connecting with an MIT professor. (And MIT could track their behavior by tracking the LinkedIn URL.)

Mathew offers a generic visual example based on second stage of the buying process. If someone is seeking social proof in their research for a product or service, a simple email including a link to content from a third party talking about your product, service, or related proof-type research could work, such as this:

ShortEmailwithTwitterLink

Don’t send the prettiest email

While the example above demonstrates the ability to quickly create an email with value, it also exemplifies the real value in communicating the same way a person would email a friend or colleague. It’s authentic and personal.

“Our job is not to be pretty. It’s to be effective,” Mathew says. He explains that HTML-pretty emails are holdovers from the world of direct mail – they aren’t a marker of legitimacy but a marker of marketing.

Rich text is how humans write emails.


HTML-format emails are pretty but pretty isn’t our job. Rich text is how humans communicate, says @MSweezey.
Click To Tweet


A large U.S. bank that Mathew works with tested the difference between HTML and rich text. It sent the same email using the two formats. Engagement, as measured in open rates, was four times greater for the rich-text format emails.

Get them to ask the next question

Mathew offers a scenario familiar to many in business. You go into the boss’ office to share an idea. The boss says no. A few weeks later, the boss comes back with a “new” idea – the same one you suggested a few weeks earlier. Your boss now trusts the idea because it is his or hers.

Your prospects are like that boss. You can’t just send them a series of six emails after they download a white paper and expect them to buy. You have to let them come to the answers on their own.

Your job is to nurture them to ask the next question. Companies using lead nurturing the right way find they close deals 34% faster, according to Salesforce research.


Companies using lead nurturing the right way find they close deals 34% faster, says @salesforce via @anngynn.
Click To Tweet


So how do you do that in an email?

Include a secondary call to action in your email. Then the recipients select what content they prefer – and that tells you if they are still in the second stage, for example, or if they’ve moved onto the third stage. But, Mathew cautions, that only works if your content is tailored to the buyer stages.

Emailwith2CTAs

Put your email in play

A PGA golfer has 14 clubs in his or her bag. The professional golfer must pick the best tool based on the setting of each ball and the situation of the overall game.

Like a golfer, marketers also have a limited number of tools to use to accomplish infinite scenarios at high efficiency. That’s why your email nurturing plays should be limited and able to be recombined to accomplish different scenarios.

Mathew shares the scenario of marketing at a trade show. When you get back to the office you have a lot of email addresses but don’t know where each contact is in the sales cycle. He urges you to follow the 3-2-1 process:

  • Assume all recipients are in stage three. Because anyone actually in this stage is closest to a sale, it’s important deliver to this group first.
  • If recipients don’t respond, presume them to be in stage two. Email stage two relevant content.
  • If they don’t respond to stage two, assume they’re in stage one. Email stage one relevant content.

Repeat this cycle three times – when you send an email the recipient finds useful, she or he will select the content, letting you know where that person is in the buying cycle.

Mathew worked with eCornell on a 3-2-1 email campaign based on paid search leads. The close rate was 50% and engagement was 16 times higher than non-nurtured prospects.

EmailLeadNurturingatScale

Onboard your subscribers

Your company likely has a process to onboard new employees. Do you have one to onboard new subscribers? Or do you just email them the next blog post that you send everybody else?


Don’t just send the next email to new subscribers. Onboard them with your best content, say @MSweezey.
Click To Tweet


Remember, your next blog post likely isn’t your best one. Instead, the first five emails your new subscribers should receive are the five best blog posts you’ve written. Then, you can start sending them the standard email.

Salesforce research reveals 50% of high-performing marketers use email onboarding, while less than 1% of underperforming marketers do.


High-performing marketers use #email onboarding. Less than 1% of underperforming marketers do, says @MSweezey.
Click To Tweet


It’s the halo effect. “First impressions matter. Every interaction is shaded by that initial impression,” Mathew says.

Connect on social

With an email address, you can truly unlock the value of social media, particularly its highly valued hyper-targeted paid promotion (especially important given the organic reach of social media posts is less than 2%.)

Consider the case of Volvo Construction, which Mathew shares. Its dealers sold $100 million worth of new and used equipment in a year through Facebook. The social media platform is its number one lead driver.

Now how can a big B2B company use Facebook to make those sales? Email addresses. It uploads its email lists to Facebook and Facebook can match the ads directly to those individuals. So the Volvo database can see the content by email and by social. Plus, Facebook can target people who “look” just like the profiles of those direct-match users.

Volvo saw overall engagement increase by 22% when recipients received an email from Volvo and saw a Facebook ad from the company – far better than any single communication.

“You’re not just sending an email but you can target that person on any channel,” Mathew says.

Forget cookies

Mathew also says the future of omnichannel marketing is the email address. Hashing technology now enables you to track the behavior of an email address online across multiple devices. Cookie technology can’t do that.

You can learn when the last time the person visited your website, the point at which they stopped watching a video, etc., and all those behaviors can be assessed in your marketing automation platform to deliver the next email with the most relevant content.

By getting more behavioral data – beyond the open and click rate – you gain the context necessary to create better content for communication and more targeted content to drive a conversion.

Conclusion

As you strengthen your commitment to your email strategy, Mathew offers these reminders:

  • Email is best when it’s human – we want relationships with people, not machines
  • HTML is not a best-in-class email format anymore – rich text emails receive better engagement rates
  • Email + social media = content marketing powerhouse

Remember, growing your subscriber base is not about boosting your numbers for the next e-blast. It’s about using that email address to deliver more relevant content when the recipient wants it.

HANDPICKED RELATED CONTENT:
7 Organic Tips for Growing Your Email ROI

Want to learn first hand from great experts in content marketing? Make plans today to attend Content Marketing World 2017, Sept. 5-8, in Cleveland, Ohio. Use code BLOG100 to save $100.

Cover image by Joseph Kalinowski/Content Marketing Institute

The post 8 Things Any Good Marketer Should Know About Email appeared first on Content Marketing Institute.

Tags:

No, Paid Search Audiences Won’t Replace Keywords

592d0dbcc43a41.38252761-53b5b739e0080abc276e0a9c30855a197432749c

Posted by PPCKirk

I have been chewing on a keyword vs. audience targeting post for roughly two years now. In that time we have seen audience targeting grow in popularity (as expected) and depth.

“Popularity” is somewhat of an understatement here. I would go so far as to say that I’ve heard it lauded in messianic-like “thy kingdom come, thy will be done” reverential awe by some paid search marketers. as if paid search were lacking a heartbeat before the life-giving audience targeting had arrived and 1-2-3-clear’ed it into relevance.

However, I would argue that despite audience targeting’s popularity (and understandable success), we have also seen the revelation of some weaknesses as well. It turns out it’s not quite the heroic, rescue-the-captives targeting method paid searchers had hoped it would be.

The purpose of this post is to argue against the notion that audience targeting can replace the keyword in paid search.

Now, before we get into the throes of keyword philosophy, I’d like to reduce the number of angry comments this post receives by acknowledging a crucial point.

It is not my intention in any way to set up a false dichotomy. Yes, I believe the keyword is still the most valuable form of targeting for a paid search marketer, but I also believe that audience targeting can play a valuable complementary role in search bidding.

In fact, as I think about it, I would argue that I am writing this post in response to what I have heard become a false dichotomy. That is, that audience targeting is better than keyword targeting and will eventually replace it.

I disagree with this idea vehemently, as I will demonstrate in the rest of this article.

One seasoned (age, not steak) traditional marketer’s point of view

The best illustration I’ve heard on the core weakness of audience targeting was from an older traditional marketer who has probably never accessed the Keyword Planner in his life.

“I have two teenage daughters.” He revealed, with no small amount of pride.

“They are within 18 months of each other, so in age demographic targeting they are the same person.”

“They are both young women, so in gender demographic targeting they are the same person.”

“They are both my daughters in my care, so in income demographic targeting they are the same person.”

“They are both living in my house, so in geographical targeting they are the same person.”

“They share the same friends, so in social targeting they are the same person.”

592d0dbd756cd6.83482363.jpg

“However, in terms of personality, they couldn’t be more different. One is artistic and enjoys heels and dresses and makeup. The other loves the outdoors and sports, and spends her time in blue jeans and sneakers.”

If an audience-targeting marketer selling spring dresses saw them in his marketing list, he would (1) see two older high school girls with the same income in the same geographical area, (2) assume they are both interested in what he has to sell, and (3) only make one sale.

The problem isn’t with his targeting, the problem is that not all those forced into an audience persona box will fit.

In September of 2015, Aaron Levy (a brilliant marketing mind; go follow him) wrote a fabulously under-shared post revealing these weaknesses in another way: What You Think You Know About Your Customers’ Persona is Wrong

In this article, Aaron first bravely broaches the subject of audience targeting by describing how it is far from the exact science we all have hoped it to be. He noted a few ways that audience targeting can be erroneous, and even *gasp* used data to formulate his conclusions.

It’s OK to question audience targeting — really!

Let me be clear: I believe audience targeting is popular because there genuinely is value in it (it’s amazing data to have… when it’s accurate!). The insights we can get about personas, which we can then use to power our ads, are quite amazing and powerful.

So, why the heck am I droning on about audience targeting weaknesses? Well, I’m trying to set you up for something. I’m trying to get us to admit that audience targeting itself has some weaknesses, and isn’t the savior of all digital marketing that some make it out to be, and that there is a tried-and-true solution that fits well with demographic targeting, but is not replaced by it. It is a targeting that we paid searchers have used joyfully and successfully for years now.

It is the keyword.

Whereas audience targeting chafes under the law of averages (i.e., “at some point, someone in my demographic targeted list has to actually be interested in what I am selling”), keyword targeting shines in individual-revealing user intent.

Keyword targeting does something an audience can never, ever, ever do…

Keywords: Personal intent powerhouses

A keyword is still my favorite form of targeting in paid search because it reveals individual, personal, and temporal intent. Those aren’t just three buzzwords I pulled out of the air because I needed to stretch this already obesely-long post out further. They are intentional, and worth exploring.

Individual

A keyword is such a powerful targeting method because it is written (or spoken!) by a single person. I mean, let’s be honest, it’s rare to have more than one person huddled around the computer shouting at it. Keywords are generally from the mind of one individual, and because of that they have frightening potential.

Remember, audience targeting is based off of assumptions. That is, you’re taking a group of people who “probably” think the same way in a certain area, but does that mean they cannot have unique tastes? For instance, one person preferring to buy sneakers with another preferring to buy heels?

Keyword targeting is demographic-blind.

It doesn’t care who you are, where you’re from, what you did, as long as you love me… err, I mean, it doesn’t care about your demographic, just about what you’re individually interested in.

Personal

The next aspect of keywords powering their targeting awesomeness is that they reveal personal intent. Whereas the “individual” aspect of keyword targeting narrows our targeting from a group of people to a single person, the “personal” aspect of keyword targeting goes into the very mind of that individual.

Don’t you wish there was a way to market to people in which you could truly discern the intentions of their hearts? Wouldn’t that be a powerful method of targeting? Well, yes — and that is keyword targeting!

Think about it: a keyword is a form of communication. It is a person typing or telling you what is on their mind. For a split second, in their search, you and they are as connected through communication as Alexander Graham Bell and Thomas Watson on the first phone call. That person is revealing to you what’s on her mind, and that’s a power which cannot be underestimated.

When a person tells Google they want to know “how does someone earn a black belt,” that is telling your client — the Jumping Judo Janes of Jordan — this person genuinely wants to learn more about their services and they can display an ad that matches that intent (Ready for that Black Belt? It’s Not Hard, Let Us Help!). Paid search keywords officiate the wedding of personal intent with advertising in a way that previous marketers could only dream of. We aren’t finding random people we think might be interested based upon where they live. We are responding to a person telling us they are interested.

Temporal

The final note of keyword targeting that cannot be underestimated, is the temporal aspect. Anyone worth their salt in marketing can tell you “timing is everything”. With keyword targeting, the timing is inseparable from the intent. When is this person interested in learning about your Judo classes? At the time they are searching, NOW!

You are not blasting your ads into your users lives, interrupting them as they go about their business or family time hoping to jumpstart their interest by distracting them from their activities. You are responding to their query, at the very time they are interested in learning more.

Timing. Is. Everything.

The situation settles into stickiness592d0dbe272274.84326307.jpg

Thus, to summarize: a “search” is done when an individual reveals his/her personal intent with communication (keywords/queries) at a specific time. Because of that, I maintain that keyword targeting trumps audience targeting in paid search.

Paid search is an evolving industry, but it is still “search,” which requires communication, which requires words (until that time when the emoji takes over the English language, but that’s okay because the rioting in the streets will have gotten us first).

Of course, we would be remiss in ignoring some legitimate questions which inevitably arise. As ideal as the outline I’ve laid out before you sounds, you’re probably beginning to formulate something like the following four questions.

  • What about low search volume keywords?
  • What if the search engines kill keyword targeting?
  • What if IoT monsters kill search engines?
  • What about social ads?

We’ll close by discussing each of these four questions.

Low search volume terms (LSVs)

Low search volume keywords stink like poo (excuse the rather strong language there). I’m not sure if there is any data on this out there (if so, please share it below), but I have run into low search volume terms far more in the past year than when I first started managing PPC campaigns in 2010.

I don’t know all the reasons for this; perhaps it’s worth another blog post, but the reality is it’s getting harder to be creative and target high-value long-tail keywords when so many are getting shut off due to low search volume.

This seems like a fairly smooth way being paved for Google/Bing to eventually “take over” (i.e., “automate for our good”) keyword targeting, at the very least for SMBs (small-medium businesses) where LSVs can be a significant problem. In this instance, the keyword would still be around, it just wouldn’t be managed by us PPCers directly. Boo.

Search engine decrees

I’ve already addressed the power search engines have here, but I will be the first to admit that, as much as I like keyword targeting and as much as I have hopefully proven how valuable it is, it still would be a fairly easy thing for Google or Bing to kill off completely. Major boo.

Since paid search relies on keywords and queries and language to work, I imagine this would look more like an automated solution (think DSAs and shopping), in which they make keyword targeting into a dynamic system that works in conjunction with audience targeting.

While this was about a year and a half ago, it is worth noting that at Hero Conference in London, Bing Ads’ ebullient Tor Crockett did make the public statement that Bing at the time had no plans to sunset the keyword as a bidding option. We can only hope this sentiment remains, and transfers over to Google as well.

But Internet of Things (IoT) Frankenstein devices!

Finally, it could be that search engines won’t be around forever. Perhaps this will look like IoT devices such as Alexa that incorporate some level of search into them, but pull traffic away from using Google/Bing search bars. As an example of this in real life, you don’t need to ask Google where to find (queries, keywords, communication, search) the best price on laundry detergent if you can just push the Dash button, or your smart washing machine can just order you more without a search effort.

592d0dbed54fc2.59445448.jpg

Image source

On the other hand, I still believe we’re a long way off from this in the same way that the freak-out over mobile devices killing personal computers has slowed down. That is, we still utilize our computers for education & work (even if personal usage revolves around tablets and mobile devices and IoT freaks-of-nature… smart toasters anyone?) and our mobile devices for queries on the go. Computers are still a primary source of search in terms of work and education as well as more intensive personal activities (vacation planning, for instance), and thus computers still rely heavily on search. Mobile devices are still heavily query-centered for various tasks, especially as voice search (still query-centered!) kicks in harder.

The social effect

Social is its own animal in a way, and why I believe it is already and will continue to have an effect on search and keywords (though not in a terribly worrisome way). Social definitely pulls a level of traffic from search, specifically in product queries. “Who has used this dishwasher before, any other recommendations?” Social ads are exploding in popularity as well, and in large part because they are working. People are purchasing more than they ever have from social ads and marketers are rushing to be there for them.

The flip side of this: a social and paid search comparison is apples-to-oranges. There are different motivations and purposes for using search engines and querying your friends.

Audience targeting works great in a social setting since that social network has phenomenally accurate and specific targeting for individuals, but it is the rare individual curious about the ideal condom to purchase who queries his family and friends on Facebook. There will always be elements of social and search that are unique and valuable in their own way, and audience targeting for social and keyword targeting for search complement those unique elements of each.

Idealism incarnate

Thus, it is my belief that as long as we have search, we will still have keywords and keyword targeting will be the best way to target — as long as costs remain low enough to be realistic for budgets and the search engines don’t kill keyword bidding for an automated solution.

Don’t give up, the keyword is not dead. Stay focused, and carry on with your match types!

I want to close by re-acknowledging the crucial point I opened with.

It has not been my intention in any way to set up a false dichotomy. In fact, as I think about it, I would argue that I am writing this in response to what I have heard become a false dichotomy. That is, that audience targeting is better than keyword targeting and will eventually replace it…

I believe the keyword is still the most valuable form of targeting for a paid search marketer, but I also believe that audience demographics can play a valuable complementary role in bidding.

A prime example that we already use is remarketing lists for search ads, in which we can layer on remarketing audiences in both Google and Bing into our search queries. Wouldn’t it be amazing if we could someday do this with massive amounts of audience data? I’ve said this before, but were Bing Ads to use its LinkedIn acquisition to allow us to layer on LinkedIn audiences into our current keyword framework, the B2B angels would surely rejoice over us (Bing has responded, by the way, that something is in the works!).

Either way, I hope I’ve demonstrated that far from being on its deathbed, the keyword is still the most essential tool in the paid search marketer’s toolbox.

Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!

5933755.gif

Tags:

Chatbots Are Transforming Marketing

chatbot-8fa361b91c1083f3b816840dd8d0f40f335b67e1

Marketers’ interest in chatbots is growing rapidly. Globally, 57% of firms that Forrester surveyed are already using chatbots or plan to begin doing so this year. However, marketers struggle to deliver value. My latest report, Chatbots Are Transforming Marketing, shows B2C marketing professionals how to use chatbots for marketing by focusing on the discover, explore, and engage stages of the customer life cycle.

The success rate for chatbots today is low — Facebook reported that its chatbots failed 70% of the time — and some early adopters have dropped their chatbots due to disappointing performance. Most chatbots fail because companies:

Read more

Tags:

IoT World Forum: Mind The Skills Gap With Insights Services

iotwf-46b46ddcf7ad34073c4a2f9ab07524f9ce12c3f5

IoT World Forum 2017 has just wrapped up and the biggest takeaway for me was the skills gap. Companies don’t have the expertise to fully implement and benefit from their IoT initiatives.

This was the fourth year of the event, with a theme of “taking IoT to the next level” and “bringing it all together.” The organizers were clear on their mission to help the audience with concrete “how to” sessions. As a moderator of one of the main stage panels I was instructed to make sure the discussion wasn’t just a review of the limitless possibilities of IoT – the theme of a previous forum – but rather to discuss how to make IoT stick and scale – to get beyond the pilot. That hasn’t been easy for many companies undertaking IoT initiatives.

Read more

Tags: